About this Site Copyright Information Email Us Medium Home

A Call for the Return of Slavery

by John Minus

The Rev. Louise Rathakhan of the Nation of Islam today called for further restitution to African-Americans for the pain and suffering inflicted on africans taken hostage and shipped to America during slavery. “Some people say that we should be given back pay, but I say that is just another token arrangement offered by the white devil in order to keep the black man pacified and civil. The only real way for us to be even is an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. Every African American family should be issued one white slave, or two depending on where and how long their family was forced to serve the white establishment.” This controversial, and completely unreasonable demand was almost universally denounced by most important leaders, and actually by most intelligent people. The Rev. Jesse Jackson was quoted as saying “Oh, we knew that nigga was crazy for years. We don’t pay him no mind anymore.” A black New Brunswick resident had this to say. “Yeah it’d be nice if I could get some of these uppity rich-ass cracker barrel white kids to scrub out my toilet every other day, but this is America, and as long as that’s true there will be no white slavery. Though I guess the mature thing to do would be to let bygone be bygones and not blame people for the sins of their fathers. But I’d still rather have me a house cracka to order around.” Rabbi Krustofsky gave this comment, “Hey, if we get German and Egyptian slaves, them I’m all for it;. What did the blacks do, pick a little cotton? We built the pyramids, and now we’re sitting here like shmucks while the blacks get their own gentile slaves? Do I look like a meshugginah to you?

Why Christianity Is More Old School Jewish than Judaism

By Christopher “Clearly Not Jewish” Taylor

When was the last time you sat down and read the Torah? I mean really read the Torah? Did you notice the numerous references to other gods? The way that gods like El continually are referenced throughout the book?

Certain some are considered adversaries of Yahweh. Some are disregarded as human constructs designed to lead the ancient Yahwehites astray. A significant number, however, are adopted into the collective. These local deities are deemed either too important or of too little consequence to do away with by other means, and so are absorbed into the monotheistic tradition. And are considered to have always been part of the collective.

Consider hard-core monotheists; consider, for example, modern Jews. Many have a rather naļve outlook on worldly matters and consider Yahweh to be a singular and distinct entity.

Consider loose monotheists; consider, for example, modern Christians. Many have consider God (most Christians either don’t realize or disavow God’s reduction to Yahweh) to composed of a Trinity of sorts, and many further acknowledge the presence of alternative deities like Satan that have yet to be vanquished/absorbed.

Who is more Old School Jewish: the Christians, hands down. For their polytheistic monotheism, I applaud them in their traditional outlook. Not like those forward-looking Jews.